Home Learn A lump sum

From the data · no account needed

A lump sum: all at once, or in parts?

You have money in a bank account and you want it invested. Here is what about twenty years of Indian index data says about going in all at once or in monthly parts, and what it cannot tell you.

In short

What was measured

Take two people with the same money, on every month-end since Sep 2007 for the Nifty 50 and Apr 2005 for the Nifty Smallcap 250. One invests it all that day. The other invests it in equal monthly parts, and the money still waiting earns a stated rate: 0% if it sits idle, or 6% a year if it sits somewhere that pays. Both are valued five years after the start.

All at once against monthly parts, five years after the start
After five yearsNifty 50Smallcap 250
Start months measured169198
All at once ahead of 6 parts, waiting money at 0%62.7%63.1%
All at once ahead of 6 parts, waiting money at 6%56.8%59.6%
All at once ahead of 12 parts, waiting money at 6%57.4%55.6%
The middle result for all at once, against 6 parts at 6%, in points of the starting amount+2.0+2.8
Parts ahead, when the index was lower six months on (at 6%)80%84%
Below cost: all at once1.2%11.1%
Below cost: 6 parts0.0%8.6%
Worst start, all at once−4.8%−32.0%
Worst start, 6 parts at 6%4.5%−24.8%

Markets rise more often than they fall, so money that goes in earlier usually has longer to grow. That is all the first rows say. The gap is not large: in the middle case on the Nifty 50 it was about ₹20,000 on ₹10 lakh over five years, before tax. Waiting twelve months instead of six nearly doubled it, to about ₹36,000.

What the first year can look like

Whichever way you go in, this is the part that tests people.

The first twelve months after any start, and every five-year stretch
From any month-endNifty 50Smallcap 250
First 12 months: the worst−52.2%−69.1%
First 12 months: the share of starts that were down24.0%37.4%
First 12 months: the middle result9.9%8.9%
Any five years, a year: the lowest−1.0%−7.4%
Any five years, a year: the middle11.7%12.6%
Any five years, a year: the highest22.3%36.6%
Deepest fall on any day−59.9%−76.0%

Five years is not a guarantee: the Smallcap 250 was still below cost after five years for 11.1% of its start months. But it is why money with a date on it, like a home or fees in the next few years, does not belong in shares however you go in.

Why this is not the whole answer

The tables count rupees. They do not count what happens to you. If ₹10 lakh goes in on Monday and reads ₹8 lakh by Christmas, most people judge the whole idea by that number, and some sell at the bottom. A plan you can keep beats a plan that wins on paper. Going in parts costs a little on average, and buys fewer days of that feeling.

Other markets show the same shape. Vanguard’s study of US markets found a lump sum ahead of averaging in over twelve months about two-thirds of the time, with averaging in doing better in the worst years.

If you go in parts

Month-end closing prices of the Nifty 50 and the Nifty Smallcap 250 from Yahoo Finance, to Sep 2026. These are price indices: no dividends, no costs and no tax. Leaving dividends out slightly understates all at once, which has more of its money invested earlier. The 6% is an assumption, before tax. An index is not a fund or a portfolio. Past results do not tell you future ones. General information, not advice on your money.